Why EFCC shouldn’t exist...

The Former President of the Nigerian Bar Association, Dr Olisa Agbakoba (SAN) said on Thursday that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, is not suppose to been in existence. Dr Olisa said in his view that the commission is currently operating outside the Constitution, he said in Lagos at a news conferece. During the conference, Dr Agbakoba said that since the EFCC is a creation of the National Assembly, that it does not have the power to interfere with the activities of state government. The Senior Advocate of Nigeria insisted that the 1999 Constitution only provided one police force for Nigeria, adding that since the anti-graft agency was not a branch of the police, it could not perform its functions, because of some people manipulating the agency. He asserted that the EFCC remained a federal establishment created by the National Assembly, adding that under Section 4 of the 1999 Constitution, the powers of government were divided into two: the federal and state. While the conference was going on, he also asked a question, if the EFCC is created by the Federal Government can it then prosecute state offences? The Supreme Court in many of its decisions have held that federalism means two autonomous and independent governments and if that is correct, the EFCC does not have the right to go to the state and examine their accounts. Former President of the Nigerian Bar Association, Dr Olisa Agbakoba (SAN) on Thursday, said that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, ought not to have been in existence. He said the commission currently operates outside the Constitution. Agbakoba said this at a news conference in Lagos. According to him, since the EFCC is a creation of the National Assembly, it does not have the power to interfere with the activities of state governments. The Senior Advocate of Nigeria insisted that the 1999 Constitution only provided one police force for Nigeria, adding that since the anti-graft agency was not a branch of the police, it could not perform its functions. He pointed out that the EFCC remained a federal establishment created by the National Assembly, adding that under Section 4 of the 1999 Constitution, the powers of government were divided into two: the federal and state. He said: “So the question will be, if the EFCC is created by the Federal Government can it then prosecute state offences? “The Supreme Court in many of its decisions have held that federalism means two autonomous and independent governments and if that is correct, the EFCC does not have the right to go to the state and examine their accounts. Goand read the section 46 of the EFCC Act and Section 36(12) of the 1999 Constitution. Section 36(12) states that all offences must be defined and when you now read Section 46, you ask yourself if it complies with Section 36(12) because it does not. “So what I will seek in court is that EFCC ought not to exist in the first place because it is not a branch of the police and that the job done by the EFCC is the same one being done by the Police Special Fraud Unit, so why do we have EFCC doing the same job as police. My other prayer will be whether the National Assembly can make laws for the federation and to what extent can the National Assembly which is an arm of the Federal Government make laws authorising a federal agency to exercise powers as if it were a state agency. “So all these contradictions should make the presidential candidates tell Nigerians what they are going to do about the constitution because it is defective.”